Instructions:
- Post a new discussion related to the topics covered in this module. Your post needs to provide specific lessons learned with examples from this module helping you enhance your leadership capacity at work.
- After posting your discussion, review posts provided by other students in the class and reply to at least one of them.
Understanding the mission within your department and being able to comprehend that mission is critical to being successful, not just as a team, but as an individual within that departments. Trust is essential in any leadership role, it can take some time to gain trust of others, and only seconds to lose that trust, this the most important aspect a positive leader can have on their personnel. When it comes to trusting your personnel and in return them trusting you, if that trust is not there, they will not follow your lead, and no matter what the mission statement is, that division is likely to fail, if the trust is not there.
Trust is definitely earned and should not be implied. When a leader develops trust with his team, it is currency. I believe that exceeding expectations is also a secondary tool of trust. By exceeding expectations with a leaders team, that leader's followers will want to exceed the leader's expectations as well.
Jon I agree with you that trust should never be implied, I have worked for a supervisor that wanted the trust just based off of his rank and not what he has done for the department, he pretty much demanded it. The job is a lot easier when you have people that work for you that trust you, they will run through walls for you.
The comment I really took away from this lesson was that you can learn as much from a poor leader as you can from a great leader. I agree with this statement as I have learned a lot of what I did not want to be as a leader from those that I experienced as poor leaders. For every leader I have had I have taken things from each of the experiences to include the poor leaders and what not to do.
I agree with you here. I have learned just as much from a terrible leader than I have with a great one. In fact, probably more from the terrible leader as what "not" to do.
Leadership is leadership regardless of the job. Military, Police or other professions although very different in job duties the qualities of a good leader remain the same. To me trust and effective communication have a lasting impact on all those you serve and a failure at either is a recipe for disaster.
I appreciated how the module said that trust is your primary currency as a leader and it is something that is always developed at the top. Trust is imperative and if there is an issue, your supervisors will hear about it from you first. Exceeding expectations, technical capabilities, communication and understanding the mission are also important but trust is vital.
This module emphasized the importance of trust in public safety organizations. Trust is built through leadership integrity and transparent processes, which ultimately leads to better collaboration, communication, and fairness. When trust is present, interagency partnership is strengthened, allowing for seamless coordination during emergencies. Trust also enhances the relationship between law enforcement and the community, encouraging cooperative crime prevention efforts. Internally, trust promotes accountability and justice. Overall, prioritizing trust can help public safety institutions become more efficient, and accountable.
Lt. Col. Levin's human values that a leader must posses: courage, candor, competence and commitment are right on target. Anyone aspiring to lead must posses all four of these qualities in order for others to follow. If you are missing anyone of these, you will fail. Even though the missions of military and law enforcement organizations are different, the mindset of their leaders are strikingly similar.
I agree Jason. We can compare all types of different professions and leadership qualities will still be similar.
In this module, I learned that leaders must possess courage, candor, competence, and commitment. Leaders should also know themselves and seek self-improvement, look out for the welfare of their subordinates, set good examples, train personnel as a team, make sound and timely decisions, and seek responsibility and be accountable for all actions. Lt. Col. Levin stated that leaders must have trust, should exceed expectations, be technically competent, should have great communication skills, and they should understand the mission. It is important as a leader to possess not one but all of these skills because those below you are always looking up to you for inspiration and guidance.
By embodying these qualities, leaders set the stage for their team's triumph.
I like the focus and importance placed on " Trust" in this module. The explanation that trust is developed at the top and is a loyalty for the people that work for you really makes an impact. Without trust I can't see any endeavor having long term success.
Trust is something that is huge for me. Trust is something that is hard to get back once it is taken away from someone. Therefore, once you gain someone's trust, you need to do whatever it takes for them to keep it.
This module reiterated the topics discussed in past modules. Lt. Col Levin spoke about trust, exceeding expectations, technical competencies, communication, and understanding the mission, which is all-important in any leadership role. The module also reminded me of the similarities between police and military leadership.
Angel I agree that this module strongly reenforced the important skills and characteristics required of a good leader.
Being a great leader can be encompassed by so many different attributes and characteristics. Throughout this module, I couldn't help but focus on the leader caring for and developing and having the trust of their subordinates. To do develop competent and confident individuals, you must first be competent and confident. You must be willing to spend time developing your people and showing them what it means to be a leader. You cannot be afraid to get your hands dirty!
Jennifer, I agree. This is where courage comes in. When people see your confidence and understand the mission, they too want to be a part of that.
I concur with all aspects of the leadership dynamics and principles discussed in this module. All of the topics discussed are essential, but I think that trust between the leader and the followers is vital for any team or mission to succeed.
I agree Kyle. Without trust, the mission becomes a lot more difficult to accomplish.
Firstly, leaders must lead by example. They must set the standard for their troops to follow by demonstrating courage, discipline, and commitment. Secondly, effective communication is crucial for success. Leaders must be able to clearly articulate their vision and goals while listening to their subordinates' feedback.
Thirdly, leaders must be adaptable and flexible in their approach. They must be able to adjust their plans as circumstances change on the battlefield or in the workplace. Fourthly, leaders should empower their subordinates by delegating responsibilities and providing them with the necessary resources to succeed.
Finally, leaders must prioritize the welfare of their troops above all else. This means ensuring they are adequately trained, equipped and cared for physically and mentally.
You must trust your personnel and they must trust you if you are going to truly succeed. Leadership in the military and in law enforcement share many similarities. Honor, courage and integrity.
You're right, Malcolm. Put into your troops what you want your troops to put into you. It starts with trust. Exceed their expectations, and they will continue in your footsteps.
Trust is so important for a law enforcement leader. It can take time to build up trust with co-workers or followers. It was said you can lose trust in a second. This is a powerful thought and highlights the importance of Trust. The more trustworthy a leader is, the more he can ask of his people, and the more they will be willing to give.
I absolutely agree that trust is essential for a law enforcement leader and the amount of time it takes to earn. And it can all be lost in an instance. When people feel like you support them, demonstrate that support, have their best interest at heart, and are willing to stand on the front line with them, that trust in you as their leader grows exponentially.
This module was discussed the five lessons pertaining to military leadership. Trust, exceeding expectations, technical capabilities, communication, and understanding the mission. All factors are important for your people to understand the mission, and to have clear direction in doing so. A good leader needs to have an understanding of command essentials, and must possess courage, candor, competence, and commitment to the mission. people have to have trust in you, which will gain their loyalty towards your leadership.
Leaders will not be successful without developing trust. While it is great to be competent, there will still be things we may not know or may not have encountered before. It is important to have the courage to be able to admit when you do not know something and to be able to resolve that issue, sometimes with the employee.
This module was very informative of the five lessons pertaining to military leadership. Trust, exceeding expectations, technical capabilities, communication, and understanding the mission are five extremely important factors that all successful leaders must utilize.
Megan Russell, I agree. When a leader possesses these qualities, their people will gain trust and loyalty towards them and the mission at hand. They will do anything that is asked because they bought in to the leader, when the leader exceeds their expectations.
I took away several things from this module. I really enjoyed the presentation by Lt. Col. Levin who laid out several skills we must possess to be successful leaders in law enforcement that are taught in the military. These skills are effective in leading men and women into battle. One that stuck out to me was knowing your mission. Often, we become numb to the daily routines of police work, we forget the real reason we are out here and treat our careers as a job. We need to know and understand our mission of public serving. We must never forget that we stand between peace and chaos.
Exceeding the expectations of those that you lead struck home with me, all too often we are busy working for those above us when we should redirect and work for those that we lead. These people are "going to make it happen" and without their loyalty, trust, and dedication to the mission, we fail as leaders.
Exceeding expectations is essential for leaders to consider. Our followers are always watching our actions, what we do, and what we don’t do. Lead from the front and set an excellent example for everyone to follow.
Technical competence allows one to remain relevant. It's a student/teacher package because you are always learning and are prepared to teach those you supervise. If leaders are not educated on the specialty of their field, they can't contribute to groups composed of people who are.
Military leadership can help develop guys or gals right out of high school into leaders. In my experience, no military leader was inadequate at leading. It did not matter if it were an officer or an NCO, military leadership was second to none and helped develop a lot of leaders that entered the Law Enforcement arena.
Trust is an indispensable attribute that plays a crucial role in various aspects. It serves as a vital foundation for effective community policing and is essential for situations such as entering a dwelling alongside a coworker. For a cohesive team, it is imperative that the men have unwavering faith in their leaders, establishing a trust that originates from the highest level and permeates downwards.
Military leadership can be a great example of what a leader should be. I believe that my experiences in the military has definitely contributed to my leadership style. One thing that stuck out to me in this module was that if we exceed the expectations of those below us, then we will naturally meet the expectations of those above us.
"If you exceed the expectations of your subordinates, you will at least meet the expectations of your boss." is what stood out the most.
I agree with you, exceeding the expectations of those that you lead is a concept that most people miss as they are trying to only please those that are above them.
Great module. Military leadership is the best leader you can experience. It's usually consistent, and you know exactly what to expect. This leadership type helps you grow and can ultimately save your life. The educational gaps are factual in some instances, but this does not ever eliminate anyone from becoming a solid leader. However, I've seen a high school diploma lead as well or better than a four-year degree. It's solely up to the person and how you absorb information.
I agree. Military leadership is second to none. While in the military I never had a inadequate leader whether they were an officer or enlisted.
I enjoyed both with General Nesbitt. What really caught my attention is something I have noticed for a long time now that is common, especially with newer supervisors. Listen to those with experience. Regardless of their rank, if you do not have the experience a subordinate has you may want to ask for some advice if you haven’t experienced this situation. Just because you are a supervisor doesn’t mean you woke up today and know everything.
All five areas discussed by Lt. Col. Levin are essential to leadership. This great module quickly and precisely breaks the categories into a basic understanding to easily apply them to our tool belts. To me, communication has to be the most essential attribute. Without good communication, a leader may be unable to communicate trust, technical understanding, exceed expectations, or even explain a basic mission.
I agree John, military leadership is so similar to the leadership that should be exhibited by agencies. I never served but have taken a lot from this class and its military influence. Trust, Exceeding Expectations, Technical Competencies, Communication and Knowing your Mission are extremely important things you must possess to lead an agency in public serving. Each work in symphony with the other.
This module made some good points about leadership. Some of the best leaders in law enforcement come from military backgrounds. General Nesbitt’s story about him helping replace a torsion bar on a tank was a great example of leading from the front or being willing to do any job. Doing little things like this builds followership and trust in your subordinates, it even builds your credibility as a leader. We as leaders must never forget where we came from and not be afraid to get our hands dirty like everyone else.
All of the traits mentioned are essential to being a good leader. You must be trusted, understood and able to effectively communicate the mission to your troops. With our numbers dwindling as they are. It is imperative that we make every effort to advance our skills in these areas.
These traits are extremely important, especially in today's society. People respond very differently to leadership; therefore, you must be versatile in communicating and setting forth the mission.
Randy that is an excellent point that leaders should build these skills in order to build the trust of subordinates and keep them on the team. I have heard officers say that if it wasn’t for certain leaders then they would not have stayed around.
In policing, it is crucial for supervisors to possess a diverse range of skills and competencies to ensure the retention of our officers.
One of the key points I took away from this module was in LTC. Levin’s section on exceeding expectations. His comment “they will want to rise to the level that you have demonstrated for them” shows the importance of a leader's genuine and sincere care for their followers.
Your spot on with your point. The better example we set, the more we can expect from our team.
Exceeding the expectations of those you lead will cause them to rise to exceed your expectations is a true statement of good leadership. In ways, we have all attempted to rise above expectations for those we lead without realizing we were consciously doing so. We should all begin doing this in our everyday tasks to improve our leadership abilities and cause our team members to rise above expectations as well.
And "If you exceed the expectations of your subordinates, you will at least meet the expectations of your boss."
LTC Levin is an excellent speaker, and I enjoyed his lecture. I was pleasantly surprised when he began the conversation about exceeding expectations. I wrongly assumed he would say to exceed the expectations of your supervisors, not your followers. I think the point is much better when directed toward your followers. If you should your troops that you care for their welfare and will go to bat for them, they will give you their best effort all the time. This form of exceeding expectations is also a component of trust building. Your troops will trust you if they know you will give them your best.
In listening to this lecture and the topic that LTC Levin discussed concerning Trust, Exceeding Expectations, Technical Capabilities, Communication, and Understanding the Mission, were all practical and had similarities to law enforcement concepts as it is a service based idea. The military being the sword and the police being the shield there is a lot of topics that can interchange. When Levin spoke of Understanding the Mission, I found that interesting as the term mission creep I had heard before but never really followed the idea of what it was about. The concept of understanding what you are doing and why, so you minimize the surprise and being caught with your pants down can be mitigated by your staff and your decisions.
Of all the values Levin spoke of, I feel communication is the most important. "If your people do not understand what they are doing, they are going to do it wrong."
I agree. LTC. Levin summed it with the statement, "If you're not a good communicator, then you're not going to be a good leader".
The Perspectives on Leadership with Major General William T. Nesbit was enlightening and impressive. He was very humble and appreciative of those in his career who had guided him. He made a good point that he was in charge as an officer in the military. Still, he was very open to listening to the opinions of experienced enlisted soldiers who had been there before him and had seen battle. He said they seemed to appreciate his willingness to listen to them. He advised you to listen, observe, and read about those leaders you respect to learn from them. Be proficient and observe. See what works and what does not.
I too enjoyed listening to General Nesbitt's take on leadership. I especially liked the point he made about learning from good leaders, but we should also be learning what not to do from bad leaders.
Chief Benthin discussed the Leadership Competencies: communication, teaching/counseling, team development, technical/tactical proficiency, decision-making, supervision planning, and use of available systems. All are essential for a leader to be effective. I will work on these skills and help those under me to develop them.
I appreciated Chief Benthin's statements as well. I felt strongly about advice, being of strong moral character, and being committed to ethics.
I concur Daniel. I too will work hard on these moving forward to be the best leader I can be.
LTC. Levin’s example of the traditional volunteer military force before the 1970s demonstrates how manuals were written at an educational level higher than the intended audience, requiring conscripted service personnel to help others in their units. This created an environment of cooperation, with each individual utilizing their knowledge to supplement that of their peers. This cooperation was a form of team building, with each individual combining their strengths to strengthen the collective.
The same principle can be applied in law enforcement today. With limited resources and funds, it is not always possible for every division member to receive in-depth training on a topic. However, having trained officers share their knowledge with the rest of the division can help spread important information, promote team building, and spark further interest in a given subject. The deputies at my agency will typically share some nuggets of knowledge when freshly returning from a class. This helps to create an environment of support and encourages the growth of each team member.
I agree James with your statement and found that when he discussed the idea of how to modify communication to meet the education level of your targeted employees is a good idea when you have different levels of education and comprehension. If your employees do not know what they are supposed to do, then no matter how good you think you are communicating it is just wasted effort.
I feel the four traits discussed: courage, candor, competence, and commitment; are pivotal to our successes as leaders. As Lt. Col Levin’s discussion, I agree that trust is the foundation in which leadership is built. Without it, you are not a leader.
Agreed Jarrett,
Trust is essential for building a lasting relationship with your people. Hard to establish, easy to lose, and even more challenging, if not impossible, to regain.
This module brought me back to my many years in the military, and the importance that was stressed of leaders nd leadership. As a young Soldier, it was drilled in us that in order to be great leader you have to Be, Know, and Do. You had to "BE" technical and tactical proficient in your job and your actions for you as a leader are always being look upon. It was equally important to "KNOW" your own strength an weakness and seek self improvement and know the same of all those you lead. finally "DO", do what is right at all times; take the good and the bad and have ownership of it. The point was to build in the support and trust of those that follow your leadership and be fair and impartial when recommending both reward and punishment and always but the Soldiers need above my own.
I do not have any military training, but I have been in law enforcement for a while. The trend in the military and in law enforcement that needs the most work is communication and understanding of said communication. I’ve had several instances where I explained my intentions to an employee and after the employee executed my instructions, it wasn’t right. After conversing with the employee and trying to understand the mix up, what I told them and what they heard were two different things. After a couple of these, I started to self-access and figure out a better way of getting the understanding of the mission across. I want my people to succeed and I don’t want to put them in a situation they don’t understand because of miscommunication. If I do that, then I have failed them as a leader.
Chad, I agree that without clear, effective communication, the chances for mission success are drastically reduced. In both the military and law enforcement professions, clarity in communication is of utmost importance. When understanding instructions, miscommunication can lead to severe consequences that could ultimately lead to failure.
I have had similar experiences with communication. It does not happen often, but when it does, I either need to think about rephrasing what I am trying to convey, or I will seek assistance from another supervisor to repackage the message.
I especially liked the comments on trust being a leader's primary currency. Trust is something that can take years to build and can be shattered in seconds. Being truthful and trustworthy with your troops every day is the single best thing a leader can do in my opinion.
Absolutely. Trust and accountability go hand and hand. If you gain the trust of those that you lead, they will in turn return the trust in their action to accomplish the mission. Trust is earned not giving. Being accountable for your actions and that of your subordinates, peers and superiors show all that you are a leader worthy of their trust and support because you have their best interest at hand.
I agree. Trust is essential to success in leadership and can be completely lost in an instant.
In this module it talks about how if the people under you do not trust in you, it will cause problems. This is so true on many levels. To get the best out of the people who are under you, you must have their trust and know you will support them. A good leader will make sure his/her people are well versed in the mission and give them the training to achieve goal. The trust of the people and communications are essential elements for a mission to be accomplished.
I understand that some traits may appear more important than others, but if you start taking any of them away or lessen some over others, you will have breakdowns in different areas. They all feed off one another and encompass each other. Having served in the military and law enforcement, I would have to expect the five lessons Lt. Col. spoke about to be all equally important.
Good advice provided in this module: “If you’re not technically competent"– your people are going to know it and “Not a good communicator- you are not a good leader”. Every leader needs to be familiar with the skills of not only their job but they also need to know the jobs of their subordinates as well to lead, guide and direct.
I agree a leader has to have a level of familiarity with the work their team is doing out in the field. Jumping in and helping out as a leader is a great way to demonstrate competency with your team. I have found that leaders are often a "jack of all trades and a master of none". Officers do not want to be micromanaged daily, but they also don't want a boss that hides in the office making blind rulings from their desk. Their is a middle ground between the two extremes!
I definitely agree. I worked for a few supervisors that did not know the jobs of their subordinates and it was hard for anyone to ask them for help on a case.
I enjoyed this module and the information provided. I agree with the four important values; courage, candor, competence, and commitment. These are essential for law enforcement leaders. Candor, I believe, is often overlooked and underused by law enforcement leaders. We must be open and honest with subordinates to achieve the desired behavior. I liked the idea of sharing commanders' intent in missions.
Session #015
The section on communication made me think about how I communicate with others. I learned that I need to ensure that I am communicating at a level that allows the other person or people to understand the point I am trying to get across. If I am giving instructions to subordinates I must make sure that they understand my instructions so that they can accomplish the task.
While all aspects covered in Lieutenant Colonel Levin's lecture are important for effective leadership, trust and communication stood out the most to me. I think this especially true when agencies face significant change.
I agree that trust and communication are essential to effective leadership in times of change.
Joseph Spadoni, Jr.
Session #15
Traits among leadership are typically the same between law enforcement and the military. Trust and communication are regarded as the most important traits needed within our professions. It is important that our subordinates trust us as leaders so that they can rely on us and it is also important that we are able to communicate well with them to convey the messages we are giving them. It is also important that our leaders trust us so that we can do more things with latitude.
I'm on the same belief as well. The comparison is similar and revolves around combating similar issues. To trust each other is very critical. If that is mutual, then other things will fall into place. Subordinates will be trainable (as long as you can communicate), listen to their supervisors, and understand the mission. This creates tech competencies, and so on. It all starts with trust.
LTC Levin hit on what I believe are the most important aspects of a leader but especially leaders that are in positions of middle management. As leaders we must be especially careful that we convoy each of the traits LTC Levin described to be a well rounded leader from the view of higher authority and subordinates.
I agree these aspects are most important for mid-level leaders. They are in the best positions to drive accomplishments and initiate widespread change.
I agree I really enjoyed LTC Levin's take on leadership and the experiences that he had to become a great leader. Middle management is a critical leadership role as it is the bridge between subordinates and higher management.
I believe that this lesson was on point. I believe that the most important part of the lesson was one understanding the mission and the communication. Although everything discussed was important those are what stood out to me. As a leader I think that is very important to understand the capabilities and limitation of our group.
I agree, for if you do not understand the mission and you do not communicate with one another, it is a recipe for disaster.
I have often been told that it was acceptable to transfer supervisors from different divisions to any other division with no experience in their new assignment. A supervisor doesn't need any technical expertise in a new assignment because they are there to lead, not perform the job. It might help short term, but it won't be as effective as having someone with the technical knowledge of the job.
I have been told the same thing. In my experience I have seen this to cause more problems in the long term and requires a lot of attention.
In this scenario, Walter, the leader will have difficulty leading when technical competence or expertise is required. Blind transfers cause problems because the followers perceive themselves to be more qualified than the leader. At that point, technical competence is only one problem. Communication problems, failure to fully understand the mission, and trust problems are soon to follow. A person who lacks the aforementioned qualities cannot exceed expectations. A person in this position can establish themselves, however, by educating themselves on the division specialty. If their leadership qualities are present, they can learn the technical side, which would be a start to exceeding expectations.
Another module and another conversation on the importance of communication. Communicating with your people at all levels is critical to the organization's success. This even includes when it is time to have tough conversations. A tremendous amount of negative attitudes and rumors can be quelled with effective communication.
Lt. Col. Levin spoke of some important principles leaders must have. Of the ones reviewed believe that trust is the most important. Trust will help build a better culture with the people around you, both above and below. It also will help inspire others.
I think trust is the most important principle LTC Levin spoke of. Trust is essential for relationship development. Trust also fosters loyalty.
Kecia, I agree. Trust stands out to me as being the most important. Our subordinates need to be able to trust us in our decisions and leadership. With that we will empower them to do more in accomplishing our goals and our teams goals.
If people underneath your command do not understand the mission it will be very hard for the organization to get anything accomplished. Understanding the mission and properly applying steps to get there will be very beneficial for everyone involved.
Most law enforcement organizations have based leadership and rank structure on one of the military branches. Hence the term paramilitary. Lt. Col. Levin spoke of trust, exceeding expectations, technical capabilities, communication, and understanding of the mission, and they are all critical to the successful operations of a law enforcement agency. I believe all these qualities are necessary for a leader to be successful.
This was a great module. I liked the overview of the 4 human values, courage, candor, competence and commitment. I have known many superiors without one or more of these. I enjoyed the video by MG Nesbitt, and his statement that to be a good leader, you have to be a good follower. Also, to seek advice of others around you, specifically your subordinates. I liked as well Col. Levin's talk about the leader understanding the mission, so your people can and do the right thing. Good lesson.
- Another great lesson, especially on the discussion of important human values within a leader, courage, candor, competence, and commitment.
Trust and communication are critical to leadership in any situation. To complete a task, you have to know what the job is and trust your leader that what he wants is the right thing to do.
I agree, it is especially important that these two concepts are at the forefront. Through trust and communication, it builds a team to have a better mutual understanding.
Military Leadership: There’s no real difference between military leadership and law enforcement leadership having served in both. The values are essentially the same, we just have different missions however, it's worth pointing out the portion on "Commanders Intent" when it comes to understanding the mission. Missions start with the organizational head and are handed down through the chain of command but by the time the mission orders reach the operators in the field, they have inevitably been changed or distorted through the relay process. This is like the exercise where you pass crucial information from one person to the next through a chain and compare the originating information to the end information. The relay creates unintended distortion or changes to the originating information. That’s why it's important to know the "Commanders Intent" when executing your mission so you can align the commanders’ goals with your actions when you encounter an unexpected situation.
This module showed the importance of trust. Trust builds morale and motivates employees. When you have leadership that is not trustworthy, you'll see a department with internal problems. As a leader, it is important to be honest with your subordinates to establish a good working environment.
I agree and have witnessed it firsthand on more than one occasion
I've often heard the adage that we should "under promise and overdeliver" as a way to talk about the importance of exceeding expectations. This might be the first time, however, that I've heard someone suggest that leaders ought to exceed the expectations of their subordinates. For some reason, it's natural to think of expectations as being top down, so I may have a good sense that my job is to serve my subordinates, but when when I think of "expectations," I generally think of what those above expect of me and my team. I appreciated Lt. Col Levin's position on this. It's helpful for leaders to think of followers as our customer base. If this is the case, it only makes sense that we would want to exceed their expectations.. This builds trust, and as Lt. Col Levin pointed out, encourages them to rise to that same level.
I caught that same comment as well, Jeff. I liked the thought of exceeding the expectations of your subordinates. What better way to inspire and cultivate trust. I liked the story about installing the tank track as well. I am very fond of a memory of a commander strapping on his vest and joining me on a search warrant one time. It means so little to them, but means so much to us.
I feel like I come back to this several times each area, but this module all boils down to being engaged with your officers. It is hard to develop trust or articulate the mission when you lead through email. Unfortunately, the higher you go up in our agency, the less you are engaged with even those one rank down. My biggest take-away thus far in the program is we must be committed to spending less time behind our computers and more time in front of our officers. If we want officers to know what we want from them, we want to increase morale, and we want to be more connected, we must commit to actual facetime. I am not always sure how we get there as it will require significant realignment with administrative workloads, but I know it is possible, and clearly necessary. I hope we can get some traction on this moving forward because these lessons will be hard to implement without better communication and relationships.
It's interesting that you mention this, because when I first came to the position I'm in now, I would feel anxiety about how much time I was spending walking around the office talking to people. I kept feeling like, "I need to get back into the office and get back to my real work." I was constantly having to remind myself that getting out of the office and walking the floor was my "real work." This seemed easier in Patrol because I could show up on calls and just work part of the call. This made the transition between the "real work" and the Real Work of checking in on my people, interacting with them, and revealing myself to them seem more natural.
Lt. Col. Levin’s instruction of exceeding the expectations of subordinates was a significant point for me in this lesson. Really this is an extension of leading from the front. By exceeding the expectations of subordinates, leaders are positively impacting the lives or work experience of their subordinates. The subordinates will be more inclined to reciprocate by working hard for the leader when called upon to perform above normal expectations. This would be another part of the culture for a high performing team.
This module reiterated several things that have been talked about in several of the modules. Those are trust and communication. Both are extremely important in our line of work. Our leaders must be able to trust us as commanders and supervisors, our people need to be able to trust us as their leaders and know we aren't going to lie to them or steer them wrong. We have to be able to trust our people and ensure they know the mission which enhances our trust in them while they are out dealing with the public. We have to trust that they are doing the right thing and following the mission objectives when we are not there looking over their shoulders. This in turn builds trust in the organization from the community.
Dan,
I agree trust is vitally important. Officers must be able to work and know we support them. I do believe the lack of trust falls on us quite a bit. If we as leaders outlined the mission, officers would be more confident in their actions knowing we not only support them but endorse the actions they take. We generally send officers out into the field, asking them to follow a six-inch thick policy manual without providing any real guidance. I believe if we were out in the field with them more, and spent more time covering situational response, that trust would grow, and their public interactions would be better.
Communication and Understanding the Mission were two points that stood out to me and I believe they go together. As a leader, it is important that you have clarity regarding the organization or unit's mission and that you can effectively communicate that mission to those you work with. Also, it is important to understand the capabilities of your team and ensure they are clear on the limitations they have. Whether those limitations be legal requirements or procedures that dictate the actions they can take.
I liked Major General Nesbitt's comment on not assigning others a task that you are not willing to do. I believe that we all need to continue to be proficient in the areas we ask our people to do. A little thing of doing something that other's may believe is "beneath you" always gets amazing dividends in the end.
I agree. I also enjoyed this story and believe it is so true. Completing a task that was small in his mind had a major impact on the troops he was leading. I think this principle is important to remember and not get so caught up with administrative tasks that we miss opportunities to work in the field with those we supervise.
As most I'm sure would agree, trust in the most important, I believe without competency and the ability to communicate information trust will never occur.
- Agree Michael, trust seems to be the foundation.
This module on military leadership does have significant application to leadership within law enforcement. This discussion on trust, exceeding expectations, technical competencies, communication, and understanding the mission are lessons that are very applicable in law enforcement. I appreciated Lt. Col. Levin’s explanation on exceeding the expectation of your subordinates. Typically, leaders try to impress the ones above them with little regard for those below them. I have seen from my own experience the dividends from exceeding expectations of those who are not only my direct reports but several layers down. The trust that is gained from the officers knowing that you are putting them first is priceless. As Lt. Col. Levin stated trust is the primary currency a leader has. Trust in your people and their trust in you as a leader will ensure a cohesive unit.
The information on communication provided by Levin was insightful. I really never thought of the short comings that can occur if your communication is above the education level of who you are addressing. This would require yet another area where we need to be mindful of our words to assure understanding of our message. Additionally, the communications we send out in writing need to have the same considerations. I think written communications often become too flowery where basic conversation level is so much more effective and to the point.
This module holds some good information that can be translated from military leadership to law enforcement leadership. The biggest thing that I heard several times was if your people do not know what the mission is, and do not understand what they are doing, they will do it wrong. Communication is always key to understanding. If our people are not communicated with, then we are failing as leaders. Everyone needs to know the mission.
This module made some key points and gave some excellent information. I believe trust was the most important. Trust is the foundation of leadership. Without trust, you cannot depend on your subordinates to follow you and do the right thing. When you have trustworthy leadership, it creates a better working environment, and others will gladly follow. Colonel Levin gave great points and ensured that this module gave off valuable information.
I agree. Trust is so important. We must be trusted by our superiors and by our followers. We also need to be able to trust our people to do the right thing when they are out there interacting with the public because we can be there looking over their shoulders all the time. By them doing the right thing and knowing the mission when out in public builds trust from the community.
I agree. A department with a culture of trust will have employees willing to jump in and bring ideas to the table. When an employee trust the administration will always go the extra mile to do the right thing.
Leadership starts with trust. Trust moves up and down the chain of command and it is earned, not just given with a title. It is important for the leaders to understand the mission in order to communicate it to their teams. If we do not understand the mission, how can we successfully lead our people? How can we expect them to know the mission if we have not clearly communicated to them? As leaders, I think this is one area we fall short in. Often, we just assume they know the mission and what has to be done to achieve it. Clear, consistent communication is key to successful delivery. As leaders, it is our responsibility to help our people develop so they can meet and exceed expectations.
Nothing in leadership is a given. We must work for the privilege of leading and that includes earning trust. Trust is possibly one of the most important elements in leadership as it seems to lay the ground work in everything a team does, from interpersonal communication, motivation to exceed expectations, teamwork, etc. Trust is the foundation of everything.
I agree with your post. I find myself also struggling at times to communicate the objective in a manner that can be understood by all. I have often stopped myself from sending something out to the patrol officers and sought guidance from those that it will affect. When I communicate in this manner and can see the trust being built and the level of confidence increase.
I enjoy listening to military leaders speak about leadership and their experiences. Through my law enforcement career, I have found that a lot of what we do is based on the military’s example. For one, it’s usually easy to understand, and secondly, it’s proven to work in varying situations. I use the things I learned from the military on a daily basis.
Like many other mentioned in the posts, I also believe trust is the cornerstone of all relationships and the foundation of our job. These relationships of trust have to be developed both within the department and externally with the community. These relationships are hard to develop and maintain and easy to lose when trust is broken. Currently in our profession, trust is very fragile and we as leaders in law enforcement have a lot of work to do to re-establish trust.
I believe the most important part of this module is making sure that everyone understands the commander's intent. I have experience several occasions in which I have been given instruction on a task that "come from the Sheriff", and completed that assignment with the utmost attention, only to find out it was not what he wanted. His intent was not correctly understood by my chain of command and was relayed to me incorrectly. Obviously, for the commander's intent to ben clearly understood it should be heard directly from the commander and requires communication to be emphasized.
This module reinforced the need for good communication and trust. If you cannot communicate what needs to be done in order for everyone to understand it, then things will fall apart. Each person of your team should understand your intent. Your people have to trust you; both your leaders and your subordinates. Your leaders have to trust you to get the job done and your subordinates have to trust you to have their back.
Trust is so important as leaders in Law Enforcement. Without it the entire team fails. We as leaders must make sure that we are instilling trust in our people, both trust in us and in the mission.
I agree. In addition to the establishing a mutual trusting relationship with their subordinates, the leaders should also be on the lookout for members of the work group, who do not trust each other. This lack of trust needs to be addresses using the conflict management techniques. Trust must be restored, or the group dynamics need to change.
The topics Lt. Col. Levin and Chief Gary Benthin covered were very useful. I feel that the topics really highlighted essential skills that leaders must possess in law enforcement. The importance of trust and how it is developed was very on point. I feel trust is essential for any leader. If followers don't trust their leader, all the other skills the leader has will be worthless. Trust is the foundation which all the others are built upon.
Col. Levin illustrated that effective communication is a core leadership function and a key characteristic of a good leader. From experience, the leader must be a skilled communicator in limitless relationships at the organization level, in communities and groups in order to achieve results through others.
Relationships are key. They are overlooked sometimes, but they are our saving grace when we run into obstacles during the course of our duty because those relationships can help us around the obstacles.
Col. Levin's instruction in this video was all valuable, but for me on a personal level, the aspect of trust was most important. He described it as the primary currency of a leader. I couldn't agree more. It goes back to being a credible leader. If you aren't credible by way of being trusted, then you can't effectively lead people.
Trent I agree with you completely. If you lose trust, you lose everyone.
I agree with you Trent. If there is no trust, then there are no relationships to build upon. Things will just fall apart.
This module presented by Col. Levin was instrumental in conveying what it takes to be a good leader. I was drawn to the topic of trust. Without trust existing between you and the people you lead; the mission will be swayed and create issues within the organization. Col. Levin said it best when he stated that trust is difficult to develop but easily and quickly lost. It should be our goal as leaders to display trust in all that we do and gain the respect from our subordinates which in turn breeds positive results from all involved.
I found this module interesting because I do not come from a military background. However, I know that a lot of great leaders do come from a military background. It was interesting that from the military leaders they interviewed the consensus or common theme to being a great military leader is being strong, honorable and committed. It only makes sense because those are characteristics of any great leader. I appreciate the evaluation to military leadership because law enforcement often times mirrors military in its structure. So, I think that these concepts and outlooks on leadership can be applied to our careers as LE leaders.
I find the correlations between the military and law enforcement interesting. All the traits in a leader for both military and law enforcement are essentially the same, but their missions are so much different, yet if your leader doesn't have those traits in either, then people aren't going to follow. I think it comes back to the warrior/guardian mindset - whichever you prefer, but the concept of something greater than yourself and what those you lead expect out of you.
Jared,
I agree. I also do not have a military background but it is obvious as to why law enforcement organizations are considered
"para military". Honor and commitment should be high on the desired characteristics of leader in any type of organization; especially a LE one. We would do well if we adopted more of the military type evaluation of future leaders.
I have to agree with the majority on this discussion. Out of all the topics discussed in the module, trust is considered the most valuable element in leadership to me. As Lt. Col. Levin states, your people need to know they can trust you, not only people you lead but people who lead you. It gives them confidence you can perform your duties. I feel that without trust, everything else falls to the wayside.
As mentioned above, trust is part of the foundation for our job. Without trust, others will not see you as an effective leader. Not being trusted will stop you from becoming credible and thus losing followership. Eventually, this distrust will erode relationships and potentially creates a toxic leader out of you.
Tyler,
I agree that trust is the foundation of our jobs and to be an effective leader. We should hold ourselves to the higher standard and set the precedent that others will follow. If we lose that trust, it may be harder to regain or recover from in the end. We must strive to maintain our trust within the organization and to the people we lead. This in turn will create the followership desired and the positive result we strive to achieve.
Tyler, I completely agree with you, trust is the foundation of what we do and the cornerstone of all relationships we have both professionally and personally. When we lose the trust we lose the people we are entrusted to lead and the continued support of the community. We recently saw the effects of distrust from our community. It has lead to a lot of scrutiny, civil unrest, legislative changes that strip police officers of tools, up to the proposal to decertify police officers for mere accusations of misconduct. Law enforcement leadership has a lot of work ahead to rebuild the trust and relationships with communities and members of our own agencies.
Lt. Col Levin breaks down what is needed by a leader succinctly, the need to understand the mission and communicate that mission clearly to your subordinates, while demonstrating your technical competence by example will lead to trust being developed within your team. The team has expectations of you and when those expectations are exceeded, then they become loyal and are willing to follow.
Curtis that was a great breakdown of the lesson. I totally agree with your points.
Cutis, good summary of the lesson. You hit all the points I was thinking while listening and taking notes.
Trust to me is the foundation for all. Without it people will not wish to exceed expectations as they feel like a number or without trust how can you be looked at as competent. When you have trust you inherently have credibility, loyalty, and real followership.
Sir, I also think trust is the foundation for the other topics. Trust plays a critical role in our everyday relationships.
While there was a lot of good information in this module, I found "understanding the mission" to be of most interest to me. It have been my experience that missions often fail when there is not a clear understanding up and down the chain of command. If there is not a clear understanding then it opens the door for misinterpretation and ultimately results in frustration and finger pointing.
Donald,
I agree that understanding the mission is a very critical to command essentials. I have also seen missions fail due to either miscommunication or the lack of understanding. I have also been on a team that I did not have a clear understanding of what our mission was and it was frustrating.
Understanding the mission is vital. Without understanding the mission, you are going into the unknown and it is possible that others will get hurt. Great post!
This is why communication is so vital. Without effective communication, there cannot be understanding.
I thought the 4 human values was spot on to be essential for good leaders. All 4 are needed to build trust with our people. If one is lacking, it seems trust can and will be compromised. I can truly understand Lesson 1 by Lt Col Levin of Trust. People need to know that you are not going to use them for your own gain, that there is loyalty...to the people above and below you.
Competence was mentioned several times in this lesson and others. Sometimes, I feel this is an overlooked, yet very critical, characteristic of leading. Gary Benthin mentioned seven leadership competencies, then included competence as an important human value. Dennis Levin also highlighted the importance of technical competencies.
When a leader lacks competency, they lack the ability to lead, motivate, generate enthusiasm, garner support, develop culture, and drive the ship. Competency is more than a cookie-cutter skill. It ebbs and flows and looks different for varying positions and roles. Yet, subordinates clearly recognize competence or the lack thereof from their leader. It must be a proven characteristic that continually grows with the organization. Competency should be incessantly honed and not allowed to hit the climax, then taper off.
I agree with you completely. Competency is so vital to a leader's credibility. It is very difficult to build trust around someone who doesn't know what they are doing or can't make decisions as issues change and modify. As much as we want to believe they are doing the best they can, sometimes it is not good enough for use to put our trust in them.
Brian you are correct that it is human nature to doubt someone's leadership if they lack the fundamental understanding of the work or issues at hand. Competency goes a long way towards understanding and potential buy in with your people as they believe you do understand their issues and desires.
I agree that competency is indeed important. That competence must appear in your knowledge of the job in question and your leadership abilities. Without it, people are not going to listen and follow
I would consider this my favorite module yet. I like many others really enjoyed the section on trust and how important it is as a leader in an organization. If you do not trust those you lead or are trusted as a leader you are bound to fail. The exceeding expectations model really stuck with me as well. Being able to exceed the expectations of your subordinates is also important and will go along way with those you lead.
I agree Zach. I would go as far as saying that exceeding expectations is also self-motivating and keeps the fire strong.
Having trust from your command and subordinates is key for a leader. Much more will be accomplished towards accomplishing the mission and vison of the agency when there is trust. Equally important in having the public's trust in our agency, leadership and staff because without their trust and partnership, we will struggle to be successful.
I agree trust is key in developing relationships with superiors as well as subordinates.
Trust is the bedrock of any leadership position. Your followers must be able to trust you as their leader and you must trust them. I really enjoyed hearing from Maj. Gen. Nesbitt and the advice he received from his father; you lack experience as a leader. I might even say you continue to lack that experience in every command you are elevated to and I completely agree with the general's dad that we have to trust those with the experience we lack. Learn from them and lend a hand every chance you get and create opportunities for continued development, both for yourself and those you lead.
I agree, Jonathan. Trust is a very critical piece in leadership. Being able to have trust in those with the experiences we lack is a very good point. We must be willing to learn and help those around us.
Jonathan, I agree, General Nesbitt's advice was sage. Whether your mature enough to accept that advice is another story however if you can, it will certainly enhance your leadership abilities. Experience is a workplace or battlefield advantage to be explored and taken advantage of.
Of the traits required to be a successful, credible military leader and as described in the module, I'd say trust is number one. Trust is the bedrock that all of the other traits build off of. Without the trust of your men and your superiors, you would be unable to properly implement or even possess in an effective way, the command essentials necessary to be successful. Trust is developed and earned by displaying your competence in the job, true caring for the well-being of your men and woman, and effective communication by keeping them properly informed.
Obviously, I totally agree as some of our language is the same. And I liked how you tied in the command essentials. I also believe that trust is built by empowering and mentoring others. As Lt. Col. Levin's example explained, exceed your followers expectations and they will go far beyond what you can imagine to exceed yours.
A clear understanding of the mission is essential to the success of achieving the agency's goals. Everyone must have a clear understanding of what the mission is. Communication is key. People can misinterpret if left to translation. This is important that this information is clear from top command down to all the agency's employees.
SWAT Teams get this one right. At least mine did. Prior to pre-planned missions, team leaders were given specific assignments to accomplish. Those tasks were collected and then placed into one Operations Power Point. We had pre-raid briefings with very detailed plans. Questions and alternative thoughts were expressed. Any changes were clearly detailed and everyone knew of any changes. The mission had specificity, clear leadership, collaboration, and inclusivity. All missions had success of some sort or another. And then we followed up each mission with a debrief. If our agencies utilized these same skills in detailing the mission statement and vision everyone would be on the same page and there would be much accomplishment!!
I agree Jose. As a leader you have to ensure each member of your team understands what needs to be done.
I agree that understanding the mission is essential. Understanding the mission and having subordinates trust your leadership are both essential factors.
Out of all the principles LTC Levin spoke about; I feel trust is the key. If there is no trust than; there is the absence of a relationship and communication. We need to develop trust to have loyalty. Loyalty can only be develop through trust and effective communication. The individuals we lead must have trust in us. Most importantly we want them to be loyal as well.
Although I agree, it seems to me that they are all connected. I don't think you can have trust without effective communication the same goes for building relationships. I use to think communication was the key of all things. I still believe its necessary but cant imagine having any of these without the other.
I agree Kevin. Trust is the foundation for all of the other command essentials.
I feel that communication is the most important principle LTC Levin outlines. Without proper communication both up and down the chain, the other principles are almost impossible to achieve. LTC Levin did an excellent job presenting each principle.
I find when a mission fails it's not because the mission wasn't clear. The mission fails because the listener misunderstands or wants to hurt the mission.
That's when effective communication and loyalty plays a major factor. To develop loyalty you must have trust.
I thought Lieutenant Colonel Dennis Levine's and Chief Gary Benthin's presentation was very clear, concise and to the point regarding his viewpoints on the military leadership. A good leader must have a good understanding of the "command essentials" which are command policies, authority, responsibility, chain of command, discipline, and conduct. Chief Benthin also said that leaders must have four very important values which are courage, candor, competence, and commitment. When he talked about those values and the command essentials, I immediately correlated this with the core values of the magnanimous officer. They are very much alike and breed good leadership qualities and all are an integral part of the credible leader as well.
Military leadership is similar to law enforcement leadership. Communication is a big part in both Military and Law enforcement leadership. I believe that it is important for a leader to have courage, candor, competence and commitment in both Military and law enforcement leadership. When you have leaders that are untrustworthy, the organization will suffer.
Military leadership and police leadership have many close correlations. like how they had a few military leaders give their perspective on leadership. Chief Benthin talked about a leader needing technical proficiencies. Needing to know at least the basics of how to do the jobs of those you supervise. I have seen several occasions in my agencies where a supervisor was promoted into a new division and had to learn the job their people were doing as well as learn this new level of supervision. They end up having the people below them teaching them a large portion of the job. This does not build trust or confidence in a leader.
Although all of the principles LTC Levin spoke of were obviously important, I felt trust was the most important. I especially agreed with his explaining the idea of getting in front of and bringing attention to a problem immediately as a means of building trust..
I agree that trust is the most important of the principles. If more leaders would try to get in front of a problem rather than trying to sweep it under the rug and hope nobody notices it would definitely improve trust.
I really enjoyed this lesson. I agree with the 4 human values that the General said leaders must possess. It takes courage to be a great leader. You cannot be afraid of doing your job. It also takes candor. A leader must be open, honest, and sincere. A good leader must show competence. They must have proficiency in professional knowledge, judgement, and skills. Lastly, the general stated in the lesson that a good leader must be committed. They must be dedicated to carry out missions and serve. I think this module gave great knowledge and inspiration to leaders. Lt. Col. Levin gave great examples while explaining trust, exceeding expectations, technical competencies, communication, and understanding the mission.
I really enjoyed this module. I think the military does a phenomenal job of training and cultivating leaders and there is a lot we can learn from them. Of course there are differences, but as a paramilitary organization many of the concepts are applicable.
Military leadership is always mission oriented. It is understanding why LTC Levin chose those five topics. But leadership is a relationship and all positive relationships require trust and communication. Which is why I think Communication has been referenced in every module of the program.
Benthin, G. (2017). Military leadership. Module 1, Weeks 7 & 8. National Command and Staff College.
Ronald, I agree that trust and communication are very important. Leaders that are untrustworthy and lack effective communication skill can will cause an organization to suffer. Untrustworthy leaders will not build positive relationships
I agree. When I compare these modules to life experiences, effective communication or the lack of seems to be a common factor. Without communication, the other principles are weak.
The foundation of trust as a leader is very important. If you do not have trust and you have the inability to have people follow you, you have nothing but rank on your shoulders.
Agreed. Although all principles are important, I felt trust was the most important.
I appreciated all the discussion topics. But I was exceptionally pleased with the concept of "exceeding expectations". I found it interesting how Lt Col Levin put that into perspective. The concept of the leader exceeding the expectations of his/her followers will facilitate motivations of the followers to exceed the leaders expectations. Well said!
I agree. As a leader, you have to be able to find ways to motivate your officers. I feel like this is a good way to do it.
Very well said by the colonel. Exceeding expectations is certainly an important part of a quality leader.
Many of the public safety command essentials align closely with those of the military. Imbibing trust in your colleagues and being a trustworthy leader are key in this regard. Additionally, technical and tactical competencies are crucial in cementing credibility with your subordinates, as is ensuring clarity in communication.
I found it interesting that exceeding the expectations of one’s subordinates will likely ensure you at least meet the expectations of one’s superiors. In doing so, if we over-deliver in engagement and expectations, we will be ahead of the curve. In keeping with consistency in our practice of leadership, it is imperative to identify and address any deficiencies or weaknesses each of us may have to improve our service. Disallowing mission creep and keeping the train on the tracks is important to efficiency as well as service to the mission at hand.
References
Benthin, G. (2021). Military leadership. Module # 1, Week # 4. National Command and Staff College.
Kenneth,
Per usual your summation is spot on. Exceeding expectations is a great way to encourage loyalty and increase morale. But communication is key in any relationship and in my opinion the most important skill.
This module talked about the importance of having and building trust in addition to exceeding expectations. It also provided quite a long list of leader qualities, command essentials, and human values that all leaders must have. As I was listening to the list and the numerous qualities on it (I believe it was over 25 if I counted correctly), it really made me think about the complexity of being a leader. As a leader, we have to wear many hats, be able to do many different things, and do it all in a way that shows trust, value, and motivates those we lead. One of my take-a-ways from this lesson will definitely be the need to remember to continue to learn and grow as a leader. There is no way any of us can maintain all the things expected of us, (to a high degree) unless we remember to also continually work on ourselves and our own skillsets.
This module was an excellent reminder of how important courage, competence and commitment is to great leadership. One of the most important points is that trust starts at the top and trends down through the department. For an agency to be successful in their mission and values a leader needs to be the standard for everyone in the department to follow.
I agree Travis. This lesson did remind us about the importance of human values. The instructor did a great job breaking everything down and giving examples.
I found the concept the trust flowing from the top down very interesting. It rings true in law enforcement where people often look up for elements of trust, and won't do things because they don't trust a person. For example, if they don't trust their shift commander to back their correct decisions they may become less proactive. It's interesting to apply this to an entire department, all the way up to the Chief to see how a department functions.
All the topics learned in this module are important but the last one Understanding the Mission really stuck out because your people need to know that you understand the mission as well as they do. They need to know that you are aware of every call they make and if they may need help you will send backup.
I found the topic of technical Competencies to be intriguing. In the past in our Sheriff`s Department, people would be promoted all the time that lacked the skills needed to get the job done. Our past sheriff could be the definition of the “good ole boy”. Who you knew was just as important if not more than what you knew. We have a sheriff that has done away with this and we have begun to get people in the positions that are deserving of them. In return, the department runs so much smoother than before.
I liked the section of the training on "understanding the mission". It is important leaders have a clear understanding of their mission, resources available to them, and limitations of their staff. In law enforcement, we encounter unique situations everyday that require decisions to be made by officers. Leaders that understand their mission and share that understanding with others, help ensure that the decisions being made are consistent with the agencies mission. "Command intent" can be used as a guide to help base decisions when the outcome is uncertain.
This is the same one that stuck out to me too. We have to make sure our people know that we are there for them and that we will make the right decision when needed.
LTC. Levin stated the mission will change and we must be ready for it. This was a great reminder that nothing in our world ever seems to ever go “as planned.” Leaders must expect continuous change throughout their career, and be willing to serve as the catalyst of change for their subordinates. As the mission evolves we must remain optimistic, and be resourceful with what we have on hand.
I agree. The more involved we are with our staff on the "front lines", the better capable we are to react to changes quickly. Leaders must work with staff on solving problems and be ready to adapt to needed changes.
I agree, I have seen so many leaders that are reputable, good leaders, but when the situation gets sticky or veers from the norm, the panic sets in.
I agree. Our world is so dynamic, it seems like change is the only constant. The adaptation of a leader during their career progression is incredibly important not only to adapt to the inner workings of the department, but the needs of the community.
I think this is an important point. The ability to adapt and overcome is vital in the dynamic environment in which we work. Maintaining optimism through that process is a game changer.
This was a good module to connect the leadership lessons which can be used by both military and law enforcement. I liked the lesson regarding understanding the mission, which seems to be integral to team success. I think this includes the specific mission the team is engaged in, but also the larger organizational mission. I think it is also necessary for the supervisor to lead from the front to provide direct leadership and facilitate communication.
I really liked how he talked about exceeding the expectations of those below you. So many times we are worried and concerned above meeting or exceeding the expectations of those above that we lose sight of our subordinates. A true leader will always put their team first. When the expectations of your team and subordinates are succeeded your team will become stronger and perform greater than if you only worry about exceeding those from above
I liked two points in this module, trust starts at the top, we know that or we would not be at this level in our careers. I have written a few 'Dear Chief' letters in my career and I have worked hard to keep my word as a valuable commodity whatever happens. I will tell the truth and take the lumps before I let anyone down up or down the chain of command. The second point I liked was in the Understanding the Mission section, it has been some time since I heard the term mission creep, but allowing the mission to take on new life can be disastrous. As officers whose primary mission is to enforce the law, the mission creeps can be easily spotted and shows we are not truly prepared or competent to handle them, one example would be dealing with people with a mental impairment. We get that job because no one else wants it, our eight to forty hours of training are inadequate but if we look at the sheer number of encounters we have and compare those that go right versus wrong we do a pretty good job outside our expertise.
The topic of “Understanding the Mission” in the module seemed to be a significant message. Leaders must know the capabilities of the unit; if not, they may expect too much or not enough. Knowing the limitations of the mission is key. In law enforcement, knowing the legal limitations can be even more important. If a leader doesn’t understand the mission, the mission may change and we won’t be ready for it. Those that look up to us, need to recognize that we know what we are doing – this develops confidence, and confidence may be crucial for success.
While listening to the part of this lecture about communication, I realized that it is important to include non-verbal communication when discussing communication skills. I believe that body language conveys a persons feelings almost as well as words in some situations.
Paul- Absolutely it does! I concur- and I see this all the time in some of my less-tenured leaders as they try to discern and interpret what the body language they are witnessing actually means. It is interesting that this skill seems to have diminished over the last several years, is it not?
Best and stay safe-
Ken
To me trust is the most important of all the topics discussed. Did anyone else notice that the section on trust was longer than other of the other areas? I would agree with Lt. Col. Levin that trust is built from the top. We should always strive to build and maintain trust between us and our subordinates.
I completely agree with you Marshall, trust is the foundation on which a building stands. It must go top to bottom and be reciprocated back from the bottom to the top. As leaders we are in a position to trust, but verify. We must be careful during verification as it may hamper our efforts in building trust with our subordinates.
It is imperative that leaders have a full understanding of the mission. It seems to be common sense that if a leader doesn't understand the mission then they will be unable to effectively communicate the mission to those down the chain of command. Without trust a leader cannot lead; If we look at all of the military commanders that have been removed from command recently there is a common phrase used on the removal; loss of trust and confidence. When that trust is lost; it may never be gained again.
Understanding the military's change to adapt to the draft vs. volunteer service created educational differences raises a question for the profession. With many more police officers attaining higher education levels, the profession is no longer a job for the person who could not go to college; why are the manuals and instruction programs relying on less than a high school education level? The technical proficiencies required of current law enforcement professionals are vastly different from the past. The technology afforded us, the reporting requirements, and laws demand a higher level of attention and instruction programs to suit the agencies' needs better.
Many "old-timers" argue that the new officers are intelligent but do not possess any common sense. This culture or belief is a challenge as perhaps the perception of a lack of common sense is that the core of the education is not resonating with them as it is not in the format that works for them.
Of the qualities discussed in the module, I believe that communication and mission understanding go hand in hand and are arguably the most important. If we as leaders don't fully understand what we are asking those below us to do, and we can't communication those expectations and goals correctly, we will fail. I feel that if we can master these two qualities, the other three (trust, exceeding expectations and technical competencies) will follow.
I agree with this – confidence is huge when leading others. Those that are following us need to comprehend that we understand the mission. This will ultimately build confidence; if this is developed, a mission has a better chance to be successful. If we don’t fully understand the mission, we won’t recognize how to deal with changes along the way, or grasp any limitations.
As leaders, we have to take into account that we don't know what we don't know, neither do our people. As the training said law enforcement is evolving and we are sending our newest and brightest officers to the new training, they may learn something we don't know. If we understand our people and we know what they have been trained in we can manage our way through situations, however, if we learn what they know and are competent we can utilize a commander's intent and complete a task or mission with the confidence of understanding what and why things happened the way they did.
Ron,
The "we don't know what we don't know" statement is beyond accurate and important to remember as a leader. It is important to consider feedback from everyone. The veterans and the new guys. The days of old school policing are gone. We need to consider new tactics and community policing.
I felt one important lesson from this module was the four important human values that leaders need. The values of courage, candor, competence, and commitment. Especially intriguing is the term candor, the ability to be frank, open, and honest and sincere with your people. Sometimes I believe followers expect leaders to only tell them things they want to hear, but you must be able to be honest with your people especially in professions like law enforcement and the military. As leaders we can still be sincere but tell our people things they may not want to hear. Competence also plays into the value of learning your craft. As leaders we must receive leadership training and know how to apply it to our specific field. How can you guide someone when you do not have extensive knowledge in the field? General Nesbitt covered this while talking about becoming a new officer and relying on his senior NCO’s to help build his knowledge. He was taught leadership in OCS but needed his NCO’s to make him competent.
As important as all five qualities are to true leadership, the model of "exceeding expectations" serves as a reminder and example for your subordinates. This is a great demonstration of leading by example.
I think that communication and understanding the mission is very important. If we are unable to communicate there will be no way we will be able to put the message of the mission out for our people to understand the mission.
This was a very good module.
I found this module very interesting. Most organizations have employees with various levels of education. Some leaders have higher education, but struggle with fundamentals of communication and being a trustworthy leader. A lot of those things can't be taught through schooling or training. Some people with higher education may develop an arrogance or think that certain things are below them because of how educated they are. They still have to remember that they can't do everything on their own and need their teams to get things done. If they aren't trusted and the team can't count on them, they will be extremely ineffective.
A lot of good content in this module. I enjoyed the section on trust and how trust is primarily your loyalty towards those you serve. Exceeding expectations took a nice turn when they discussed how exceeding your subordinates expectations of you was key to how your superiors will judge and value your ability. Also a good point made about when you exceed expectations those that you lead will follow your lead and rise to your level.
Great point by Lt. Col. Levin on trust as loyalty to the people you work for. It goes to the philosophy that we work for our followers and not the other way around. The trust must start at the top as the Colonel said. Our people must understand that we will not let them down.
The commander should always be the first in the office and the last to leave; we set the example. When we as leaders set the bar high and hold ourselves to a higher example then we increase the level of organizational competency through elevating the culture of what is expected.
I agree with you. I believe that it is more important to exceed the expectation of your subordinates than those above you. If you make this your goal than the expectations of your from above will be exceeded
Exceeding the expectations of my subordinates also helps develop trust. I never thought of this until now. But it makes sense. When we are all meeting and exceeding each other's expectations it makes for a more positive culture in the agency.
There is the word trust again. Must be important because I've seen it dozens of times throughout this entire course. As stated, it starts at the top and trickles down. Our followers have to trust us and that we have their best interests at hand. Open communication is big too. We've seen that word a lot as well. People want to know what's going on, how do things affect them, and where are we taking them. No one likes the unknown so let's not do this to our people.
Competencies are huge too. No one wants a leader to tell them "I don't know, I've never done it before." Granted there is no one leader who has done it all but we should surely have a good idea of how to do it. Well-balanced leaders are extraordinarily important. Diverse experiences make the best leaders.
"If you can exceed the expectations of those you lead, you will at least match the expectations of the ones that lead you." This should be true, but we won't always have that Legacy Leader to rely on that will be a good leader, lead by example and give good feed back. So we must be the Legacy Leader. It all comes together, now in the end of the courses.
And it's important to remember that we are the ones responsible as leaders for everyone who follows us.
Well said, Nicole. Feedback. Leading the way. Legacies. Mentoring and developing. Take care of the people and the people will take care of you are good words to live by.
I agree with your assessment. Leading by example is critical for our subordinates to observe and ideally emulate.
I agree with you. Our followers are only as good as we teach them or allow them to be.
We are in these in-depth classes on leadership. We use a manual from west point that is 400 pages long. We have generals talking about military leadership for hours. I always was amazed at one thing about the Army. They took most everything they taught and boiled it down to a 6th grade level. So that any solider could understand. I have been through many military leadership schools. I can summarize FM 22-100 (Army Leadership Field Manual) and every bit of leadership training down to three words.
Be. Know. Do.
General Nesbitt and Lt. Col Levin touch on some key leader development concepts in their presentations. First, General Nesbitt mentions how important it is for leaders to observe the actions of other leaders. I spent 34 years in the Army Reserve and retired as a Lieutenant Colonel. I deployed twice to Iraq in support of the Global War on Terror. In that time, I have seen some great military leaders and some pretty bad ones. Oddly enough, it is pretty easy to spot both. I made mental notes of some of the lessons I learned from really great leaders and still use some of them today. Second, General Nesbitt discussed the importance of seeking advice of others with more experience or skills you do not have. Your subordinates do not want you to fail because it would directly (negatively) impact them. Showing humility and genuine interest is the best way to seek assistance from others. When a leader admits that they do not know something and then asks a subordinate to teach them, they inherently build trust with that subordinate. Lt. Col Levin mentions a key concept most senior leaders forget. He talks about the fact that leaders need formative assignments to learn, grow , and be successful. When I graduated from ROTC, I was not immediately put into company command. I first led a line platoon, next I ran the support platoon (a bigger responsibility) and then I became the executive officer of the company. These assignments increased my responsibility, my confidence, and helped me prepare for assignments with greater responsibility. We as police executives should be doing the same for our junior leaders as we develop/ groom them for future assignments/ success.
One of the keys to military leadership is the military’s persistence to instill leadership. My experience was military leadership was that it was seen daily. The best leaders were all the things LTC Levins suggested: they were trustworthy, they wanted us to exceed expectations, as well as them exceed our expectations as soldiers, they knew the job, they could convey their message to the smartest and dumbest soldier, and they always understood the mission and the purpose for what we were doing…they could adapt. At the end of the day, with the better leaders, I knew I could trust them and if they fell short anywhere, I trusted that they would make it right.
And no matter how hard they were on us as soldiers, they always earned our respect. I remember so much of the candor drill sergeants carried. It drove you to want to model them.
I have to admit I had never thought of Jesus as a leader until I heard the General's perspective on it. His focus was always on selfless service and empowering people. Something great leaders identify with.
Probably, the greatest leader ever.
One guy uses credible servant leadership to train 12 guys over the course of a couple of years. Those first followers train others in leadership. Within 300 yrs, his followers took over the most powerful empire in the world.
Jed,
That was very well put. It just shows what can be done with the right leadership.
Good information and reinforced many things discussed in previous modules. While I agree all the characteristics, qualities, and skills discussed are important, I feel trust and communication are crucial. I have experienced situations where many things were in place for success from the leadership, however, there was an issue with trust or communication that resulted in negative outcomes. Effective communication is critical. If people don't know what is expected or they don't understand then it is impossible to achieve success. So, I liked what Lt. Col. Levin said "if you are not a good communicator, then you are not going to be a good leader".
I agree with Timothy. Trust and Communication are key. If your people do not trust you as a leader.. you are ineffectual. If they trust you, they will do anything for you and are more forgiving when you mess up. Like Timothy said, if you cannot communicate people will not know what to do. I would even add that leaders have to know how to maximize different communications techniques to get their vision and commanders intent across. While it is nice to be able to talk to everyone in person, it is not always practical. Leaders should be able to communicate via Zoom, email, text and in person.
I agree with your perspective on communication. As leaders we communicate in several ways and we may believe that our subordinates understand what we want done and how. Just communicating is not enough, we must ensure that what we have communicated has been understood.
Great stuff hitting on trust and communication. A person who has neither will not be an effective leader. General Nesbitt left me wanting more information. Specifically in the area of hazing and harassment when he was in OCS. I would like to know both sides. Was it meant to be part of the training or was it "outside" the rules. I would have also liked to know what he did to overcome and avoid some of the pitfalls during OCS school.
Trust is the foundation of all other leadership competencies. I think this has been a common theme in many of our modules. You can be a great communicator, but if people don’t trust you, anything you say can be discredited. If you try to exceed expectations without trust, people will think that you have a self-serving agenda. Same goes for being technically competent. If people don’t trust you they will question your motives when you try to help them. As LTC Levin said, “trust is truly the primary leadership currency.”
Trust and communication. I like how you word it, "if people don't trust you, anything you say can be discredited." True fact. If you lie you've failed at these two important leadership traits. Tell the truth, go above and beyond, take care of the people, and keep them informed.
Trust is truly a must within any and everything you do. I have to have trust within my upper administration and they have to have trust in me. As a leader I want my subordinates to trust me and with that I can develop a good rapport with them making it easier for them to come and speak with me when they have things going wrong or they don't like some of the changes being implemented.
Trust is obviously important internally however, trust from the community the agency serves may even be more important. When a critical incident such as an officer involved shooting occurs, it makes all the difference.
True. Having the backing of the community makes our jobs so much easier. We must be careful with that trust as it can be lost so much easier than it is gained.
Some great content in this module. I feel the best, by far, is regarding trust. Without trust everything else simply falls apart. If your people can't trust you there is no chance they will follow your lead and possibly even turn against you. I really enjoyed the quote at the very end of the section about trust - "Trust is your primary currency as a leader."
I also like the term "currency". It can be stored indefinitely and brought out when needed.
It is a good quote. Hopefully, our pockets are full of currency as leaders so we can get buy-in from people. Trust.
Trust may be the primary currency as a leader, but not continually building on it may put one into a deficit when the conditions change. Leaders that get stuck through relying on old relationships and conditions from the past. As discussed in the understanding of the mission segment, the failure to see change will create challenges. The antiquated actions of a leader for a different set of conditions can lead to dire consequences. As a result, this inability to adapt creates organizational failure, and as a result, the levels of trust erode. Trust is a competency that requires continual service and attention; it is hard to maintain, especially when the value is in flux.
I appreciated a couple of the things that LTC Levin talked about, specifically when he talked about trust. Trust is not a grassroots movement. Trust is developed at the top of the organization. I also like when he said that trust is the primary currency. As a leader, I will work to keep making deposits in that bank of trust. Particularly, i want to continue to build the trust of the people I supervise.
I too want to keep trust between myself and all coworkers. There just is a un-right feeling in my gut when i can not trust someone at work. Unfortunately, I have been lied to before by subordinates, caught them in their lie. Now I will not ever be able to trust them again, everything they do and say will be called into question by me.
Lt. Col. Levin said it right when he said, "Understand the mission, lead properly and show that you know what to do in situations" and "know your people well enough so you know what they are capable of and what their limitations are" I think sometimes that's where leaders go wrong in thinking that everyone is suited for every job that is needed to be done when that is simply not the case. Know what your people can handle on their own and when extra help is needed to be called in.
I agree that knowing your people’s limitations is very important and that it goes hand-in-hand with knowing your people, period. You cannot supervise them adequately if you don’t know what they can do well and what they struggle with. If you understand their limitations you are more likely to understand what tools and resources they need to get the job done, although I also agree that not everyone is suited for every job. We have to pay attention to their performance because it shows that we care and that we are looking out for their best interest when we offer help.
A lot of good information in this module. The statement by Lt. Col. Levin on trust was was spot on. "Trust is something that is very very difficult and time consuming to develop, but is something that is very very quickly lost."
The issues of trust and understanding the mission go hand in hand. Having a clear mission and communicating it to your subordinates results in clear standards and objectives, which leads to accountability. All of this results in fairness which leads to respect and trust. In my experience, one of the major issues that come up in an organization is failure of leadership to develop a clear mission (aka vision) in the first place. This results in unclear expectations and when things go wrong, scapegoating of people to take the blame that should ultimately fall on leadership. It all starts with a clear vision or mission, clearly communicated with established expectations. This is the foundation of any organization.
I found it interesting that General Nesbitt spoke about the greatest leader of all time, and he described the leadership qualities of Jesus. I can honestly say that I never thought of Jesus as a leader until I heard it from the General’s perspective.
I agree Chad. I was surprised by that answer as well but after hearing the explanation it makes sense.
I certainly agreed with this assessment. Jesus absolutely was the greatest leader of all time. He exemplified servant leadership and developed leaders to spread his teachings.
Yes, I agree. I never thought of the fact that Jesus developed those around him as leaders. I never thought about the qualities illustrated and the connection to leadership development. Great learning moment.
This lesson had several great points. They listed several traits of being a good leader and why. When followers trust their leaders they perform at a higher standard. The four human values stated in this lesson were courage, candor, competence and commitment all being important to being a good leader.
General Nesbitt said "In order to be a good leader you need to be a good follower." No matter what your rank or level of supervisor you are you are always reporting to someone.
Not being former military I found LTC Levin's discussion about communication interesting. I like the way how he stressed the importance of clear and concise communication and being sure that your subordinates could understand the message. I found it especially interesting when he discussed the military training manuals and how they had changed and adapted after admin realized that some persons were unable to understand their direction.
I think the most important lesson he discussed was that of trust. He summed the lesson up well stating that trust takes a while to earn but a short time to destroy.
Completely agree, trust is the most important. It has always fascinated me how hard it is to build trust and how long it takes. Yet, trust can be completely shattered in a matter of moments.
This module referenced several traits that great leaders posses. Leadership requires many traits to be successful, above all others, I feel that trust is the most critical to posses. Without trust, no one follows, up or down the command chain. trust should start at the top and filter down. What stuck with me about this module was both General Nesbit and Lt. Colonel Levin stated that great leaders ask advise, listen to those around them. This is something that I probably have not done enough of in my career, but will make an effort to do more frequently.
I agree, I like the way LTC Levin ended his discussion about trust stating that it takes so much time to gain but only a second to loose. I like your point about trust filtering down from the top. This flow of trust works right into our responsibility as leaders to communicate our departments mission, values, and beliefs.
This module focused on key leadership competencies in the military that transfers to law enforcement organizations. In order to develop trust, leaders must be technically competent and proficient. A leader or supervisor in law enforcement must be able to exceed the expected performance of the people that he or she work for him or her. Leadership is about developing others and empowering them to improve thought influence and trust. As stated in this lecture, some of the leadership factors that are key include: communication, trust, and technical competency. The most important of them all is trust. When followers trust their leaders, they will perform at high levels. Being a good communicator and clearly explaining the mission displays competency.
I have always believed strongly in the servant leadership approach and have witnessed many leaders achieve success using that approach. In his lecture, Ltc. Levin stated that "if you can exceed the expectations of the people that you lead, you will at least be meeting the expectations of the people that lead you." I had never heard this particular quote before, but I find that it neatly captures the potential that servant leadership can bring to an organization.
It is important to have effective communication so everyone understands the mission. Gain trust in others in order to develop loyalty within everyone you lead. Go beyond of what’s expected of you to gain trust in others, and others will follow your lead. When you lose trust, you lose support of those around you. “Trust is difficult and time consuming to develop, and can be very quickly lost.”
Good lists of needed command essentials, leadership competencies, human values, and qualities to be an effective leader. One that stood out, especially after some of our lectures from the previous modules, was that we need to ensure tasks are understood, supervised, and accomplished. The piece that I think most ineffective supervisors miss is that your people need to understand the task in order to accomplish the task. "Because I said so" is not effective leadership. My favorite point was in the section where General Nesbitt spoke on exceeding expectations- "Good leadership focuses on the expectations of the people below you." That should be our focus, and when we have the confidence, trust, respect and buy in from those we supervise, good things can't help but to happen up the chain as well.
Well stated Jim, having the command essentials of leadership competencies, human values and command essentials are the core to being an effective leader. After hearing this repeated in almost every module I am believing that you most have all these to make the grade, if you are missing one then probably you are not being effective.
General William Nesbitt's message on leadership resignated with me in this module. When asked what the difference between a leader and follower was he stated that we are always followers and in order to be a good leader you have to be both a good follower and observer. By being a follower and an observer you can learn the do's and the don'ts and what works and what doesn't from others as they lead. In addition, he stated to not ask anyone to do what you wouldn't do. I believe in this wholeheartedly. When I set new goals or missions I go out and work with the troops to show them that I am willing to do the same things I am asking of them.
There are many parallels between the military and law enforcement when it comes to leadership. The four important human values that leaders must possess are courage, candor, competence, and commitment. Beyond the human values, the most important thing a leader must have is trust. When you lose trust, you lose support. Without support, it's impossible to be an effective leader.
Excellent point! Trust is essential in both military and law enforcement leadership. Without trust it is near impossible to be an effective leader. Police officers are much like soldiers in that regard. They can't be managed into combat, they must be led.
Too many times though I've seen leaders who have no trust and no buy-in from their followers. The followers don't want to follow these people anywhere let alone into battle or a hot call.
The five qualities of a good leader, trust, technical competencies, communication, and understanding the mission, are all essential for a leader to possess. As many have stated before, trust is the foundation from which all other characteristics are built. People don't follow a leader they do not trust. It's simple as that. He or she can be an effective communicator, charismatic, and be able to accomplish the mission, but they will not last very long without the trust of their followers.
How very true- without trust , all of the other characteristics fall by the wayside. We accomplish our work through our people, and they need to believe and trust in you for anything to be more than just short-term success.
Leadership in the military and law enforcement are the same. The leaders have to be able to communicate, have the3 trust of subordinates and peers, and be able to understand and explain the mission.
A true leader must encompass good technical competencies, exceed expectations, understand the mission and effectively communicate the mission to their subordinates with the most essential trait being trust. Any relationship built on a solid foundation of trust can withstand any mission or difficulty within that mission. Having trust allows the subordinates to focus on the mission so they can achieve positive results.
Trust is key. Without having trust, I don't think it will be possible to complete the mission. Having the other four competencies are important but trust is the most important.
As many have posted, trust is imperative to leadership. If you do not have trust others will not follow you. You must also have trust in your leaders. If you do not have trust in your leaders then the organization will not grow and Ideas that they may bring to the forefront will not happen.
Trust is very important at all levels within the organization. If you lose trust within yourself, others will recognize that and lose all confidence in your leadership abilities and your integrity.
Mitch, you make a good point about trusting in yourself. I had not thought about it before, but trusting in your own abilities and decisions is critical to being successful.
Good information Captain. I like how this brings it back to servant leadership.
As stated in the lecture, there are several key leadership factors; out of those, I think trust and communication are the most important. If we communicate accurately what we are seeking to accomplish, then it stands to reason, those doing the work will trust us. When we give partial information that distrust develops and like a crack in a damn, it can spread and bring the whole organization down. As leaders do not hold back on something just because you feel it is incidental to the mission, that component may end up being the key to success for others.
Leadership in the military and law enforcement have the same traits for leaders. Communication is the most important trait to become a successful leader. As Lt. Col. Levin stated” you cannot convey the four lessons without communication”. As a supervisor I have witnessed without communication our subordinates will not follow, and we will fail as leaders.
I 100% agree with you on communication being the key. So many good plans fall flat due to leadership sleepwalking through their informational briefings. It can be frustrating for those who are about to commit themselves to work on the assignment. When they see these halfhearted briefings, they pick up on those attitudes then mimic them in the field.
No matter what organization your people need to know that they can trust you, not only the people that you lead but the people that lead you as well. They need to know that you are not going to lie to them or use them for your personal gain.
Understanding the mission is an essential ingredient to any desired success. Whether achieving a goal, beginning a trek or starting something challenging for the first time, it is vital that one first understands what it is that is being accomplished. Re-learning this principle was rejuvenating for me and helps to remind why we do some of the things that we do. I also very much appreciated the line "Good leadership focuses on those below you". This should be of no surprise to those that truly wish to make a difference!
I agree a good leader must be able to ensure their subordinates understand their assigned task in a mission with effective communication, however, if their subordinates do not trust their leader they will likely fail the mission.
Our profession is very similar and mission so the leadership ideology is very similar. Being able to use the ideals to instill leadership ideals, skills, and traits will provide better leadership. The ideas utilized are ones I feel are exemplary, strong, and go well with shaping future leaders.
All of the lessons discussed in this module are important for our profession. But like most on this board, it appears Trust struck home the most. Without trust it is impossible for any agency to maintain success. Trust should begin at the top and developed all the way down. Being in an agency is much like ordinary relationships with people and their partners, it is not a healthy way to live your daily life without trust in work or your personal relationship.
No matter the organization for leadership to be successful, trust is required between leaders and followers. In law enforcement, we model numerous policies and tactics based on the military model of leadership. In law enforcement, we even model or rank structure to reflect the military rank structure.
True facts, when I first started my career with law enforcement I never would have but these two professions together. Having family members in the military and law enforcement, we do structure the military style.
This was a very interesting and informative training module. I believe the instructors did a great job of defining the different qualities that a leader must possess. The information provided in this training module would be great to use for annual refresher training for our supervisors, in order to address some of the issues we have had lately.
I agree with you because it seems that some poeple ignore the chain of command and its too often an accepted process.
After reviewing this module we are again presented with communication as a trait or competence we have to have to be a successful leader. Communication is of the most importance. Without communication you can not convey the other 4 lessons that Lt. Col. Levin discusses. Lt. Col. Levin even states, that if you are not a good communicator you are not going to be a good leader.
There are several parallels between the military and law enforcement services. Many years ago we were called a paramilitary service, but that has now changed, in some circles to a quasimilitary showing we have a similar rank structure, creed, etc.
Many have pointed out the need for trust as a lynchpin in this leader follower relationship and it is paramount, but two other points that are important to building that trust are communications and understanding the mission. If these go well, it takes us steps closer to that trust and if bad, trust may be eroded.
No matter the organization trust and leadership are a reoccurring theme. if your people under your leadership don't trust your're
guaranteed to fail at whatever mission you have been given. I liked the story from the final speaker, when he showed to his men, gave them his tarp and cooked them a meal and coffee. He sacrificed and earned this men's trust in an hellish environment.
This module reiterates some of the same principles we have learned throughout this course. Those of us that served in the military know the parallels between the military and police organizations. It's interesting though how the concepts of leadership run through every type of organization from military, to law enforcement, to corporate, and communities. It seems to always come down to trust and communication. Trust is built by communication. If a leader can't communicated then he/ she won't be trusted and if a leader isn't trusted then their communication won't be believed.
It appears to me that trust is the foundation of what the topics are built on. Without trust everything else fails. As explained on the module, trust starts from the top and works its way down throughout the organization. Trust is the primary currency in leadership.
In this module, I was reminded of the similarities between police and military leadership. The topics that were discussed in this module were the same topic that have been reiterated in the past modules. Lt. Col. Levin spoke about trust, exceeding expectations, technical competencies, communication, and understanding the mission, which are all important in any leadership role.
Lt. Col. Levin illustrated to us that Leadership, whether in Law Enforcement, the Military, and other domains are all built on the same values, beliefs, and principles: trust, effective communication, teamwork, leading by example, competency, and clarity of shared vision and mission to foster understanding.
Trust and communication seem to be at the cornerstone of leadership in all realms as well. While it takes much time and effort to develop trust, it can be quickly lost. Effective communication is vital to understanding the vision, mission and direction we need to run in. Trust and effective communication are paramount to the leader-follower relationship between individuals within the organization, the organization as a whole, and between the organization and the community we serve.
I agree. Trust and communication are the most important principle that a leader must have.
Trust is the most important factor to become a true leader. This lesson taught that it is not just about your followers trusting you, but your leaders or supervisors also. When your leaders trust you they will provide you with rewarding assignments. It is nice to know that you are someone your supervisors feel they can go to when they need a mission accomplished. This trust also reflects to your followers as a confirmation of why they may want to trust you.
The leadership traits are generally the same between the law enforcement spectrum and in the military. The need to have trust is evident in all and being able to effectively communicate cannot happen if the communicator is not trusted. I do believe without trust it is next to impossible to truly develop and of the other levels.
Lt. Jenkins, I agree that trust is paramount in the leader-follower relationship at all levels (individual, organizational, and between the organization and the community). Trust is the first building block in the foundation for success.
I agree Dustin. I think trust is the cornerstone or foundation of any organization
I agree that communication helps build trust and vice versa, but I also think that understanding the mission contributes to the trust factor.
Like you Lt., the leadership traits between the two are certainly fairly parallel, generally speaking. I do appreciate the differences between the two and as we move more forward into the future, I believe that we will see a further divide, which may not be a bad thing. Regardless, the need to have trust is certainly more needed now in law enforcement and with our communities than before. The same is also true for those among our own ranks!
Trust is always essential in Law Enforcement. If there is no trust this can cause issues between workers and make it hard to accomplish any task.
I agree trust is what your subordinates have to feel from you, the leader and transfer that trust primarily into loyalty.
I found this module very interesting. The similarities between the military and law enforcement are uncanny. I believe trust is the most important lesson taught by Col. Levin. I feel that without trust, you can not build upon the other lessons presented.
I chose the exceeding expectations, however as they are all important. I feel that Communications piece is just as important as how employees see and handle issues. Looking as a whole, if we fail to communicate the right message, then we can jeopardize the mission as a whole.
I feel as though communication is the most import lesson covered in this module. Without communication a mission cannot be accomplished, a team cannot be developed, and you cannot properly supervise.
I agree, in law enforcement, we communicate over 90% of the time. In making decisions all communication must be effective.
I like how in the military their men and women are thought of the as the leaders weapon, where as in LE our men and women are our team to get things done. Good analogy.
I agree, communication is the most important lesson. if you can not communicate the other 4 lesson will not matter.
If the people under your command do not have your trust then you will fail as a leader. You may be able to get by in your position by title alone, but you not be considered a true leader. I have found that you must be clear in your communications with those under your command. I have failed to do this from time to time and suffered the consequences. I sometimes take for granted that those under my command will understand the gist of the instructions I have given. Only to learn that when you are not clear and concise in your intent and instructions it lend to individual interpretation of those instructions.
Communication is such the tricky aspect of this lesson. So many time we can believe the message was clear and the recipient understands when that is not the truth.
I believe that trust and integrity are the foundation of a police officer. A person must have these characteristics to serve the department and community. If an agency cannot trust an officer to make the right decision or to do the right thing, that person can cause the department to lose the trust of the community. The community losing trust in the department is something that will take a lot of time to rebuild and establish. This why a strict and thorough hiring process needs to be implemented. The departments need to try and eliminate the risk as much as possible, of hiring someone without these characteristics.
I agree with you, Beau. I think trust is one of the most important lessons taught by Col. Levin. Communication is vital, but without trust, no one will believe what you are saying.
I agree. As we have seen, failures in maintaining community trust has led to significant issues in society. Often a few bad officers cause these trust issues and identifying them early, or even prior to hiring, is vital.
I think we sometimes take for granted that our subordinates understand specific missions and they don't. I think we as supervisors should take the time to make sure that each person understands the specific mission, as this profession is constantly changing and evolving. I also agree with all of the character traits that were spoken about, and truth and communication still ranks towards the top for me.
I agree, I think that there are all important, but truth and communication is vital for law enforcement. Both these characteristics need to be instilled in all of the police officers and supervisors.
Without first having developed trust I believe your attempts at communicating the mission at hand risk being lost.
I agree leaders must make sure that our followers understand the mission. When the mission is not understood it becomes difficult for the organization to be successful.
Trust keeps coming up in several of these modules and I firmly believe that it is at the epicenter of any agency and officer credibility. Of course being competent is your ability makes someone appear credible, but have they opened their mouth yet?
Darren, you are absolutely correct. You can't build a house without a solid foundation, strong walls, and roof. Things like the color of paint and furniture won't mean a thing when the house collapses.
All of topics are important. The one that I found most interesting but never thought if in that way was communication.
He stated that the one to the short falls of communication is education. When you have different educational levels it makes communication a little difficult. Imagine someone with a PhD communication with some with a GED.
I can definitely see how communication in this example could be tough.
This is definitely true. I hadn't really considered this before, but considering education levels, writing/reading levels is important to facilitate team communication.
Communication is very important. There are no two people the same and they can't read each others minds. Everyone in the organization must be able to communicate clearly up and down the chain of command.
This is correct. Without communication, the mission fails. Without trust, any communication can be scrutinized and the mission still fails.
In learning area 4, module 1, learning the different lessons in military leadership was good. Which I believe that a leader in the military must be strong, honorable and committed to their troops. I also believe that one of the importance is trust, because without trust you will not be able to get things accomplished. Trust goes a long way within any organization.
LTC. Levin made a really good point when speaking about technical competence which leads to trust. His example in the Band of Brothers series was on point. You can have the rank and all the training and the certificates you want but if you do not know how to practically apply that information with real world experience, it’s all for naught. If your followers cannot trust that you will lead them well due to your expertise on a matter, then almost everything is lost. You cannot fake or talk yourself out of a situation where a true leader is needed.
General Nesbitt's advise from his dad was listen to your NCOs because they have the experience that you lack can also translate to law enforcement. I interpret this for me to Realize that you don't know everything and are not the smartest in the room. Check your ego.
Some of the best advice I have ever received was from those who were of lower rank than me but shared my vision. Sometimes they have the ability to keep you grounded when you have lofty expectations but also know that the mission is of the utmost importance. Having that different perspective almost always leads to success.
I couldn’t agree with you more, everyone has special talents regardless of their rank and I’ve learned over the years I was able to learn something from anyone at every level.
Stacy, I couldn't agree more. I have found that when you put a question before the right group of people, as opposed to just trying to answer it yourself, the best answer will be found. In other words, none of us is as smart as all of us.
I found the bit about always exceeding expectations to be the most enlightening. The Colonels anecdote that going above and beyond for your men will have them serve with out question was particularly interesting.
Leadership and understanding the mission are two important parts of success. I have experienced leaders who have ordered missions without clearly defining how the mission or task was to be accomplished. Lt. Col. Levins is right, If you are not technically competent your people will know immediately. If you can’t communicate the plan you will never be a good leader.
Military Leadership is often the basis of many of our leadership idiologies. Militaries have been dependent on strong leadership for hundreds of years. It is important to realize what strategies and qualities translate to our needs in law enforcement. There are key differences and that is why understanding the mission is vitally important. Being technically competent is also important for a leader to connect with his team.
It was interesting to hear the perspective that the general named Jesus as the worlds all time best leader and related it back to being a serving leader.
I found that interesting also. But when you think about Jesus as a leader, what other leader has left the impact that he has? Even if you are not a Christian, his impact is prevalent still today after all these years.
Military leadership and Law enforcement leadership are similar. I feel trust is the foundation of good leadership, and without it, all you have is rank.
In this module of instruction, I particularly enjoyed Lt. Col. Levins' discussion on trust. I liked how he incorporated that trust is to be shown to the people you, as well as the people who lead you. This trust must be earned and developed over a long period of time. Trust translates into loyalty and even know both take time to develop, they can be lost in an instant with one dishonest or selfish act. Like Lt. Col Levin said, I have always viewed trust as my own leadership currency.
I agree that trust is a cruicial ingredient for any leader. It is the one character trait that can be destroyed easily but is almost never repaired. Trust is the foundation to loyalty and integrity.
This block of instruction covered trust, exceeding expectations, technical competencies, communication, and understanding the mission were all-important for a leader to possess. Based on my thoughts, coupled with the essay question, the most important trait, especially for a leader, is “Trust.” Lt. Col. Levin mentioned that “Trust” is developed from the top and back down. I believe that we must be honest with our decisions and be transparent with our team members so they'll know the right path to take when they're presented with a challenge.
I agree trust is important. He stated that if your leaders trust you- you can do thing with more latitude and more confidence.
The General Nesbit choice of a great leader was profound. I wholeheartedly agree with him on the subject. Trust, Competence, and commitment are very important traits needed for good leaders in law enforcement.
I couldn't agree with you more about the choice of Jesus Christ as being a great leader. That was awesome of him to discuss Jesus' example of leadership. Even if your aren't a christian person, there are several lessons in leadership to be learned by following his example.
I think what I liked most about this module is the interview with General Nesbit. I found his comparison of the Army Values to Jesus’ teachings and actions fascinating. If you think about it, Christ changed the entire world by leading just a handful of people. His teachings are still taught today and whether you believe in him or not, his values are in line with true leadership. I know not everyone agrees with this but you would have to look beyond political correctness to grasp what General Nesbit was saying.
I liked General Nesbit the best. I have never heard anyone confess that Jesus Christ is the best leader. If you look at his teachings he is exactly right in his assertion. His leadership has guided many people's paths in life.
I liked the reinforcement of the four important human values of courage, candor, competence, and commitment. Lt. Col. Levin’s five lessons were equally as important. I believe we all have risen in the ranks because we were competent and trustworthy, exceeded expectations with an understanding of the mission. The fifth lesson, communication, is where I most need improvement.
I concur. Communication is an important area that a lot of us leaders need to take time and reevaluate our approach.
Most workplace issues come down to communication failures.
Military leadership is similar to law enforcement. Communication is a big part of law enforcement as well. Military leaders must possess courage, candor, competence and commitment. I liked the fact that General Nesbitt worked hand in hand with his soldiers. All leaders must know their mission as well.
Having come from both I would certainly agree with you. Law enforcement is a paramilitary organization with similar leadership traits and values. Law enforcement is more sensitive to the people they “serve” rather than the people the military “defends”. I would say the concern is different in execution of leadership styles. To me, policing is far more technical and visible for the desired end result.
I agree Roanne and as I have written about in several essays thus far, communication in law enforcement to me is the key to success.
This module showed similarity in the leadership for the military and law enforcement. I agree with the command essentials, command concepts, and the important human values.
Leadership in the military and in law enforcement share many similarities.
The need for a leader to have courage, candor, competence, and commitment is prevalent in both professions.
As has been the case numerous times over the past several weeks, the importance of trust is conveyed in this module.
I agree completely that trust begins at the top and is a two-way road. You must trust your personnel and they must trust you if you are going to truly succeed.
Christian,
Agreed! Trust is essential and it must begin at the top. I have witnessed firsthand what happens when the organization doesn't have trust and faith in their leader. The negative effects and toxicity that result is hard to fix and later overcome.
This module, like a few others, brought me back to my time in the military. Law enforcement leadership is not that dissimilar than that of military leadership. One concept we see in both law enforcement and military leadership is taking care of your people. In the military, it is called troop welfare. If you take care of your troops in all aspects such as providing them with the resources they need, thinking of them first, etc.… moral will stay up, and they will accomplish whatever mission is presented to them.
David, I was never in the military, but I must agree that it is important to take care of your people.
As a leader it is important to have the trust of those you lead. This is gained by allowing input from your team. Effectively communicate your intent on what you expect from them.
The people you serve must have your trust. I also agree that allowing your team to have input in decisions that affect them is also a necessity in forging relationships.
Great points. Trust and communication are what make great leaders. Trust truly is a currency.
This was a good module the information learned from the generals is very valuable. Its important to learn from experienced leaders.
One thing that resonated with me was when the general was asked about who he felt was the greatest leader. I expected him to answer George Washington or Abraham Lincoln, not Jesus. Regardless of your religious beliefs, he is right. I never looked at it this way, but Jesus used twelve disciples that he empowered and motivated to spread his word. Two thousand years later the words Jesus spoke are still used to motivate and empower.
Well said!
I agree with the example of Jesus. His 12 disciples spread his word, but most of all trusted in him.
Lt. Col. Levin was spot on when he said that trust is developed from the top down. When you have leadership that is not trustworthy, you'll see a department strife with internal problems. Lack of respect, professional decorum, and unethical conduct.
I agree with you Brian, trustworthy leadership is essential.
Brian, this is true, Without trust there is no leadership. Your people may respect your rank but they will not trust the decisions you make.
Agreed, when leadership sets an example from the top down it sets the right example. The same goes for respect, integrity, morals, and proper communications. Being able to have good leadership to learn from sets the future for good leadership to trickle down.
Lt.Col Levin brought up some good lessons regarding trust, exceeding expectations, communication, technical competencies and understanding the mission. They are all valid lessons. Trust is important because without it, you’re not a leader. However, I can see where understanding the mission is important as well. All too often not everyone is on the same page about what is expected of them or what is going on. That is also part of communication, or lack of.
I agree, Laurie.
Understanding the mission is vital.
I believe it is equally vital to communicate it properly, then follow-up to ensure it was understood and is being acted on correctly.
I was never in the military; however, this module is easily transferable to law enforcement. The section on communication is always a vital role in anything we do in life. Just like the example Lt. Col. Levin gave about the military recruitment brochures and learning manual being written on a tenth-grade level education when they were changed to a fourth-grade education level, they began to see a higher enlistment. In law enforcement, specialized divisions have a certain level of communication that can be hard for others to identify with, and we must consider that when we work jointly on tasks.
This module focused on several key points for ensuring effective leadership that are applicable in law enforcement. Each of the topics: trust, exceeding expectations, technical competencies, communication, and understanding the mission are all important for a leader to be effective. I think the most important is communication. When we look at mission failures there is always some component that has to do with a failure to communicate. The manner in which we communicate and the messages we communicate can built trust, show our willingness to exceed expectations, demonstrate we have technical competency, and is critical in ensuring the mission is understood.
This module has many good reminders and takeaways for law enforcement leaders. The four important elements leaders must possess discussed translate perfectly in policing, yet are often absent in management. Courage, candor, competence, and commitment need to be constantly in the forefront as we lead. Lt. Col. Levin five areas are also crucial. I believe communication is key and without, everything else will fail.
Jarod, you are right. I think that communication is vital in management as well. If we can’t communicate effectively, then how can you establish the other four areas.
I agree with you Jarod that communication is the key.
I agree. Without effective communication you will falter in establishing effectiveness with the other areas.
This was a useful module in reminding us the importance of trust. I've heard it before, "trust is difficult and time consuming to develop but quickly lost" and this was beneficial to hearing it again. If a leader loses trust and is a supervisor within his agency he has jeopardized his ability to lead.
Judith, I agree...without trust you can't be a leader, therefore, it won't matter if you can communicate, no one will listen.
I agree Judith, trust is sometimes hard to develop but is quickly lost. We both know leaders in our agency who had the trust of his people but soon lost it because of lack of competence.
I believe that communication is most important because without it, the goal of the agency can not be reached. An effective leader must communicate properly throughout the ranks not just to command staff.
I agree communication is vital, but I rank trust above communication. If your subordinates don't trust what you're saying, they won't hear you.
Trust amongst your subordinates, peers and your supervision are paramount when leading. Like Lt. Col Levin stated that trust is earned over time but can lost quickly. Lead by example and exceed expectations in everything you do. Others see you going above and beyond they may emulate what your doing. Communication is key, using language that all can understand is very important so there is no intellectual barrier so the message can be understood
The Lt. Col. touched on some very important traits of a good leader. They are all necessary in order to be a good leader. Without trust though, it would be very difficult to get someone to follow you. If I don't trust someone then I don't see them as a capable leader or person for that matter. If I trust someone I will follow them anywhere, trust is something that you work your whole life to gain and a lot of effort goes in to gaining trust from others.
Jason,
I'm in agreement with you. Trust is the foundation to all leadership and without it a supervisor is doomed.
I couldn’t agree more. Everything starts with trust. As leaders, we must trust the people above us and know they have our best interests in mind. We also need to develop trust from our followers so that they know we have their best interests in mind.
One of the most important aspects that we fail to consider as leaders are making sure that everyone understands the mission. I can say that all too often, we assume that our personnel automatically know what the mission is and how to get it done because they been through training. There are many different aspects of this profession, and not all are taught when personnel goes through the academy or FTO program. This is merely just a small part of the experience they will need along the way to be successful. As leaders, we need to adequately prepare and support our personnel by repeatedly communicating our mission. The missions are continually being changed, and everyone needs to be informed and reassured that we are focused on the same goals.
As effective leaders, LTC Levin discusses several important attributes and virtues that are important for every leader to be successful. Leadership starts with trust up and down the chain of command and it is earned. Moreover, if you do not understand your mission, how can you successfully lead your people? Helping your people grow and develop personally and professionally will help build confidence so they can exceed expectations. You must be competent and have the experience so you can teach your personnel to effectively do their job is critical, as well. The ability to actively listen and effectively communicate so your personnel have a clear understanding of the mission, how we are going to accomplish the mission, and what successful outcomes we are looking makes you a visionary and effective leader. I have found that the easiest way to keep officers focused on the missions is make it very simple, i.e., focus on crime prevention strategies; have a traffic safety plan; and, engage in specific activity that will address quality of life issues. Simplifying our core mission down to these three important public safety makes it easy for officers to understand and come up with specific strategies to address our mission.
I learned from this module that a leader has to have courage, candor,competence and commitment. Trust starts at the top and filters down and to be a good leader, we must be a good follower. If we exceed the expectations of our followers, they will do the same for us. Also of importance is understanding the mission and the commander's intent. If this is not present, thing can and will change and we will not be prepared for it.
Listening to LTC Dennis Levin one of the things that stuck with me was if you are communication with your officers or staff you must be sure that they are understanding what is being said. As you stated about the military manual, if your officers can't understand what is written due to their educational or environmental background you need to alter the materiel or how it is being presented.
Mike Brown,
As a military retiree, I was sent Temporary Duty many times to assist in writing technical data for maintenance procedures. In the Air Force our goal was to write these manuals at the 8th grade level. This way there was no intellectual or communication barrier in what needed to be understood. You are exactly correct in communication is key to get your point across.
Dan
I am also in agreement and believe the communication failures consistently jeopardize are success. Too many leaders don't realize just how important communication is.
I also agree communication is important to success. Effective communication is the key.
I agree with you, communication is a must in order for an agency to run properly.
Absolutely, I know sometimes I have something in my head I'm trying to get across but can't always find the best way to explain it. If I can't explain it clearly they sure can't understand it clearly.
I agree, face to face communication is the best way to get your point across and making sure that everyone you are talking you has full understanding of the task is a must.
Mike, that point also stuck with me. Sometimes we forget that people are not as familiar with a topic as we are and we speak in a way they don't really understand. They may even be embarrassed to get clarification. It is very important we speak in a way that our audience can understand.
Absolutely. Failure to communicate the mission in an understood way will end up with a changed mission.
There are many military command essentials that translate to law enforcement. Earning trust, exceeding expectations of the people you lead, possessing technical competencies, communication skills, and understanding the mission are all important within our public safety agencies. Trust is earned, not given when you attain a position in leadership. Possessing strong communication skills and developing these skills can help improve the trust you earn from your team, your peers and supervisors. You should always seek to exceed the expectations of those you lead, then you will at least meet the expectations of those who lead you. Possessing technical competencies is typically a prerequisite for attaining a leadership role, but some leaders are more proficient ant competent than others. It is important to identify your deficiencies, work to improve on them because you cannot bluff your way past a critical incident. Lastly, you must understand the mission and pursue excellence in achieving the mission, knowing your role and how you can lead others to achieve the mission goals.
Frank
Although all of the topics are important i believe that the most important is that all of your officers must understand the mission. far too many times the chief will give his mission to the his upper command and by the time it gets to the individual officers it has either changed or information has been left out on what is expected to accomplish the mission. It is the duty of all leaders to confirm the mission to make sure everyone is on the same page.
Monte,
I agree when a mission is given, those carrying out the mission must all be on the same page and communicate the mission in the same manner. This will ensure the mission is understood by all those who are tasked with carrying it out.
Frank
Frank, I agree and would add that if we want the mission to be successful, then it should be included in a written document so that it does change or get misinterpreted along the way. Communicate the mission verbally and then provide a written document so that the person receiving the communication does not interpret it to mean something different.
I agree with your comment Frank. The understanding of a mission ensures that everyone is on reading the same music and knows what the expectations and limitations of the team are.
So true. I find sometimes if the message is watered down and the mission fails. It is very important to give the message as clear as it was presented to you.
I agree that understanding the mission is important, but I believe that having the trust of your followers is the most important key to a good leader. If you don't have the trust, or you lose the trust, you will never have a strong following.
While I agree that understanding the mission is important, I would say that trust would have to take precedence. If the followers do not trust the leader, the mission will likely fail.
Joey, I think we all agree with you. In order to be an effective leader, the foundation must be built on trust. Without that trust, nothing else matters. You will be ineffective and you will be a positional supervisor that gets things done by giving orders - that is not leadership. Brian
Couldn't agree more. It would be very hard for me to follow someone that I had no trust in.
I totally agree, because it's like if your guys don't trust you, your shift will become divided. I like to think of it as that my guys should be willing to follow me through any fire if I maintain my trust and loyalty to them. I agree also that we can't just give out orders, we have to set the tone and morale.
While I agree that trust is one of the the most important quality's of a good leader. I would also say that competence is just as important. If a leader is not competent, then trust is no longer a factor. It would be difficult to trust a leader who is incompetent. Or, vice versa, I may trust the person, but if they are incompetent, the mission will most likely fail.
I feel the same. It's nearly impossible for me to follow someone that I do not believe to be able, or having ever been able, to perform the task that they ask of others. I agree that trust is very important, but a trustworthy person may still be incompetent.
Mark have could not have said it better myself. Trust is important aspect of all life situations. I know plenty people I trust but competence is a must. With competence comes trust also,
I agree Joey, the followers have to trust the leaders or the mission will fail.
I agree, without trust in your leaders, there is no way the mission will succeed.
I agree with Joey as well. Trust is essential to true leadership. I think the other strengths listed by Colonel Levin will have an impact on trust and therefore if you plan to achieve the most trust from your team, you should have a firm understanding or ability in all.
Joey,
That is exactly what I was thinking as I was reading the comments. You can put all the plans together, have everyone sign the peace of paper, but when it is go time if there is no trust then the mission will not be carried through.
I agree that trust is vital for any leader. As a leader, you can exceed the expectation of everyone, have the technical competencies, be able to communicate at every level, and understand the mission, but if your team does not trust you they will not follow you.
I agree trust would be prudent for the success of any mission.
Monte,
I agree that personnel must understand the mission of the organization. Failing to do so results in personnel missing the mark in their performance objectives, as well as the agency missing it's mark in achieving effective results int he community. It is the responsibility of leaders to be clear in stating the mission and objectives, as well as ensuring the message is received in the manner intended.
Monte,
I have seen this happen multiple times. One thing I have learned over the last few months is to verify and ensure the mission is clear and simple to understand. Sometimes information gets lost in translation and once the message arrives to the line officer, it is missing key information. We have to make sure as leaders to check with our troops to verify if they understood. Follow-up might be needed to clearly accomplish this. It is extremely important to make sure everyone in the organization is on the same page for mission success.
I completely agree that all leaders need to be on the same and relay appropriate information in a timely manner. Delaying any sort of information, including missions can create a lot of additional problems. One of the biggest issues my agency has from time to time, is employees hearing information from others that aren't in a leadership role and it mostly comes through the rumor mill. Employees should be able to count on their leaders to make sure all appropriate information gets to them all, and not just select people.
I agree. It's imperative to have a clear message detailing the expectations is important.